IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA
WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE
OF ARIZONA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF
CONNECTICUT, STATE OF FLORIDA,
STATE OF HAWAII, STATE OF IOWA,
STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF
MINNESOTA, STATE OF NEW YORK,
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF
OHIO, COMMONWEALTH OF
PENNSYLVANIA, STATE OF TEXAS,
STATE OF UTAH, STATE OF VERMONT,
and STATE OF WISCONSIN,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC., CENTRUM
VALLEY HOLDINGS, LLC, VERSOVA
HOLDINGS, LLC, VERSOVA
MANAGEMENT COOPERATIVE, AND
HICKMAN’S EGG RANCH, INC.,
Defendants.
Civil Action No. 5:26-cv-04060
STIPULATION AND ORDER
It is hereby stipulated by and between the undersigned parties, subject to approval and entry
by the Court, as follows.
I. DEFINITION
“Settling States” means the States of New York, Arizona, California, Colorado,
Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Iowa, Maryland, Minnesota, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania,
Texas, Utah, Vermont, and Wisconsin.
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-3 Filed 06/29/26 Page 1 of 22
2
II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over the parties to it.
Venue for this action is proper in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.
III. COMPLIANCE WITH AND ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT
A. The proposed Final Judgment filed with this Stipulation and Order, or any amended
proposed Final Judgment agreed upon in writing by the United States, Plaintiff States, and
Defendant Hickman’s Egg Ranch, Inc. (“Hickman’s”), may be filed with and entered by the Court
as the Final Judgment, upon the motion of the United States or upon the Court’s own motion, after
compliance with the requirements of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act (“APPA”), 15
U.S.C. § 16, and without further notice to any party or any other proceeding, as long as the United
States has not withdrawn its consent. The United States may withdraw its consent at any time
before the entry of the Final Judgment by serving notice on Hickman’s and by filing that notice
with the Court.
B. From the date of the signing of this Stipulation and Order by Hickman’s until the
Final Judgment is entered by the Court, or until expiration of time for all appeals of any ruling
declining entry of the proposed Final Judgment, Hickman’s will comply with all of the terms and
provisions of the proposed Final Judgment.
C. From the date on which the Court enters this Stipulation and Order, the United
States and Plaintiff States will have the full rights and enforcement powers set forth in the proposed
Final Judgment as if the proposed Final Judgment were in full force and effect as a final order of
the Court, and Section XI of the proposed Final Judgment will also apply to violations of this
Stipulation and Order.
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-3 Filed 06/29/26 Page 2 of 22
3
D. Hickman’s agrees to arrange, at its expense, publication of the newspaper notice
required by the APPA, which will be drafted by the United States in its sole discretion. The
publication must be arranged as quickly as possible and, in any event, no later than three business
days after Hickman’s receipt of (1) the text of the notice from the United States and (2) the identity
of the newspaper or newspapers within which the publication must be made. Hickman’s must
promptly send to the United States (1) confirmation that publication of the newspaper notices has
been arranged and (2) the certification of the publication prepared by the newspaper or newspapers
within which the notice was published.
E. Any person who wishes to submit to the United States written comments regarding
the proposed Final Judgment should do so within 60 calendar days beginning with the first day of
the publication of the newspaper notice required by APPA or the publication of the proposed Final
Judgment and the Competitive Impact Statement in the Federal Register as required by APPA,
whichever is later.
F. This Stipulation and Order applies with equal force and effect to any amended
proposed Final Judgment agreed upon in writing by the United States, Plaintiff States, and
Hickman’s and filed with the Court.
G. Hickman’s represents that the actions it is required to perform pursuant to the
proposed Final Judgment can and will be performed and that Hickman’s will not later raise a claim
of mistake, hardship, or difficulty of compliance as grounds for asking the Court to modify any
provision of the proposed Final Judgment or this Stipulation and Order.
H. This Stipulation and Order, including the proposed Final Judgment filed with this
Stipulation and Order or any amended proposed Final Judgment agreed upon in writing by the
United States, Plaintiff States, and Hickman’s, constitutes the final, complete, and exclusive
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-3 Filed 06/29/26 Page 3 of 22
4
agreement and understanding between the United States, Plaintiff States, and Hickman’s with
respect to the settlement of the claims expressly stated in the Complaint filed in this above-
captioned case, and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, whether oral or written,
concerning the settlement embodied herein.
IV. RELEASE – SETTLING STATES
In return for the consideration set forth in Sections VI and VII of this Stipulation, the
Settling States stipulate and agree that Hickman’s is hereby fully and finally discharged and
released from any civil claims under the laws of the Settling States arising from the allegations of
unlawful conduct in the Complaint. The Settling States also agree that the release of state claims
in this Section IV of the Stipulation shall apply regardless of whether the Final Judgment is entered
by the Court.
From the date of execution of this Stipulation, Hickman’s shall comply with the obligations
set forth in Sections VI and VII of the Stipulation regardless of whether the Proposed Final
Judgment is entered by the Court. The Settling States agree that, within seven (7) days following
Hickman’s completion of its obligations under Sections VI and VII of the Stipulation, they will
dismiss with prejudice their claims against Hickman’s by filing notices of dismissal on the
appropriate dockets. In the interim period following the filing of the Complaint, other than Tunney
Act proceedings applicable to the Proposed Final Judgment, all Parties consent and agree that
proceedings related to the Settling States’ claims should be stayed until Hickman’s satisfies its
obligations under Section VI and VII of the Stipulation, and the States will file a formal motion to
stay proceedings if necessary or requested by the Court.
V. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS – SETTLING STATES
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-3 Filed 06/29/26 Page 4 of 22
5
Nothing in this Stipulation and Order will be construed to waive or limit any private right
of action or any damages claim brought by third parties, including local and state government
agencies, or citizens of the Settling States, whether directly or as a class action.
VI. SETTLING STATE DONATION RELIEF
A. As part of the injunctive relief as to the Settling States, Hickman’s will provide or
cause to be provided three million, two hundred and fifty thousand (3.25 million) eggs to food
banks or related non-profits (the “Donee Organizations”) located in the Settling States where
Hickman’s currently does business, as of the date the Complaint is filed (the “Egg Donations”).
B. Hickman’s will apportion the Egg Donations among the Settling States where
Hickman’s currently does business, as of the date the Complaint is filed, consistent with written
instructions provided by the Settling States within sixty (60) days following the filing of the
Proposed Final Judgment. Hickman’s will cooperate with the Settling States where Hickman’s
currently does business, as of the date the Complaint is filed, in good faith to determine the Donee
Organizations, the quantities to be donated to each organization, and the anticipated schedule for
donations. Hickman’s and Settling States agree to meet and confer in good faith to identify the
specific states, where Hickman’s currently does business, as of the date the Complaint is filed, in
which Hickman’s Egg Donations will be apportioned.
C. Eggs provided in the Egg Donations must be unspoiled, non-expired, and non-
damaged Medium or Large white Grade A eggs, with at least 20-day shelf life, and must be at least
of a quality identical to that of eggs sold by Hickman’s to its grocery store or food service
customers. Eggs must be packaged in units of 15-dozen loose shell eggs or any other reasonable
manner deemed acceptable by the Donee Organization.
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-3 Filed 06/29/26 Page 5 of 22
6
D. All eggs provided by Hickman’s to Donee Organizations shall conform to all state
and local regulatory requirements, including enclosure and certification standards, applicable in
the jurisdiction of the Donee Organization. This includes, without limitation, compliance with
California Proposition 12 (Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 3, §§ 1320–1327.3) for Donee Organizations in
California and Colorado’s cage-free egg requirements (C.R.S. §§ 35-21-201 et seq.) for Donee
Organizations in Colorado. Hickman’s will not, however, be required to ship, donate, or deliver
eggs to any location in a state where it does not currently do business, as of the date the Complaint
is filed.
E. Any charitable egg distributions, including donations to food banks in the Settling
States, planned by Hickman’s prior to the filing of the Complaint will not count toward satisfying
the volume of Egg Donations required by this Stipulation, and Hickman’s will make any such
previously planned donations as planned. Only donations made after the date the Complaint is
filed, which were not previously planned, will count toward satisfying the volume of Egg
Donations.
F. In completing the Egg Donations, Hickman’s will comply with all applicable state
and federal regulations concerning food and egg safety, sanitation, transportation, packaging,
refrigeration, sales, and donations, including but not limited to the Egg Safety Final Rule, 21 CFR
Part 118.
G. A Settling State or Donee Organization may, in its sole discretion, refuse a delivery
if it reasonably determines that the delivery does not comply with Section VI.C or Section VI.D
of this Stipulation. In the event a Settling State or Donee Organization reasonably refuses delivery,
Hickman’s will be responsible for all costs associated with regaining possession of and disposing
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-3 Filed 06/29/26 Page 6 of 22
7
of the eggs at issue, and will be obligated to make a replacement delivery to the Donee
Organization in compliance with the terms of this Section.
H. Hickman’s will complete the Egg Donations at Hickman’s expense. Hickman’s will
not charge the Settling States or the Donee Organizations any price or fee, including any shipping,
freight, handling, delivery, or service fees for the packaging, storage, shipment, or for any other
task or cost associated with the Egg Donations. For the avoidance of doubt, Hickman’s will not be
required to ship, donate, or deliver eggs to any location in a state where it does not currently do
business, as of the date the Complaint is filed.
I. Hickman’s will complete the Egg Donations within eighteen (18) months following
the filing of the Complaint (the “Donation Deadline”). Hickman’s may make the Egg Donations
incrementally, provided that Hickman’s delivers the full quantity of Eggs required under this
Section by the Donation Deadline.
J. Hickman’s is obligated to coordinate with each Donee Organization as to the
logistics of the Egg Donations, to ensure adequate storage, delivery, packaging, and capacity are
available. Hickman’s will make deliveries to the Donee Organizations on dates and times that are
acceptable and reasonably convenient for the Donee Organizations.
K. Upon 30 days’ written notice to Hickman’s, any Donee Organization may redirect
its allocated Egg Donations (in whole, not in part) to another reasonably convenient nonprofit
entity located within 50 miles of the Donee Organization. In the event a Donee Organization
provides notice under this Section VI.K, Hickman’s will deliver to the new recipient in accordance
with this Section.
L. Every 90 days, beginning at least 90 days from the filing of the Final Judgment and
until the Egg Donations are completed, Hickman’s will provide the Settling States with a summary
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-3 Filed 06/29/26 Page 7 of 22
8
of the progress of the Egg Donations. This summary must include, for each donation, the date of
the donation, the number of eggs included, and the identity of the recipient food bank, as well as
any planned upcoming deliveries to Donee Organizations.
M. Hickman’s must provide a written certification to the Settling States upon
completion of the full quantity of Egg Donations. This certification must include, for each
donation, the date of the donation, the number of eggs included, and the identity of the Donee
Organization.
N. In the event Hickman’s believes that it will be unable to complete the Egg
Donations by the Donation Deadline, Hickman’s must provide written notice of the potential
failure to meet the Donation Deadline to the Settling States prior to the Donation Deadline. This
notice must include information and documents sufficient to substantiate Hickman’s inability to
complete the Egg Donations by the Donation Deadline. The Settling States may decide, in their
sole discretion, whether to reasonably extend the Donation Deadline; however, in the event that
Hickman’s cannot complete the Egg Donations by the Donation Deadline because of
circumstances outside of its control, including avian influenza or factors that impact Hickman’s
production capacity, or refusal by Donee Organizations to reasonably accept delivery, the Settling
States will reasonably extend the Donation Deadline.
VII. MONETARY PAYMENT TO THE SETTLING STATES
A. Hickman’s will pay to the Settling States a Monetary Payment in the amount of
$1,000,000 (one million dollars) before the later of (i) ninety (90) days after filing of the Complaint
or (ii) ten (10) days after receiving complete wire instructions and any related verifications from
New York. Such payment will be made via electronic deposit to New York, which shall distribute
the funds to the Settling States. Such Monetary Payment is provided for the purposes of settlement
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-3 Filed 06/29/26 Page 8 of 22
9
only and shall be apportioned among the Settling States at the sole discretion of the Settling States
as may be agreed upon among them, and Hickman’s shall have no responsibility for or influence
with respect to that allocation. This payment is not a penalty. For avoidance of doubt, Hickman’s
shall have no other financial responsibility to the Settling States and not be liable for any costs,
fees, attorneys’ fees, expert fees or expenses of any sort incurred by the Settling States.
B. The Monetary Payment may be used for any purpose the Attorneys General of the
Settling States deem, in their sole discretion, to be appropriate, consistent with, or required by, the
various states’ laws, including but not limited to:
i. antitrust or consumer protection law enforcement, including attorney’s fees
and expenses;
ii. for deposit into a state antitrust or consumer protection account (e.g.,
revolving account, trust account), for use in accordance with the state laws
governing that account;
iii. for deposit into a fund exclusively dedicated to assisting state attorneys
general to enforce the antitrust laws by defraying the costs of a) experts,
economists, and consultants in multistate antitrust investigations and
litigation, b) training or continuing education in antitrust for attorneys in
state attorney general offices, or c) information management systems used
in multistate antitrust investigations and litigation; or
iv. for any other purpose as the attorney general deems appropriate, consistent
with the state law.
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-3 Filed 06/29/26 Page 9 of 22
10
VIII. DURATION OF OBLIGATIONS
In the event that (1) the United States has withdrawn its consent, as provided in Paragraph
III.A of this Stipulation and Order; (2) the United States and Plaintiff States voluntarily dismiss
the Complaint in this matter; or (3) the Court declines to enter the proposed Final Judgment, the
time has expired for all appeals of any ruling declining entry of the proposed Final Judgment, and
the Court has not otherwise ordered continued compliance with the terms and provisions of the
proposed Final Judgment, Hickman’s is released from all further obligations under this Stipulation
and Order, except for those in Sections VI and VII, and the making of this Stipulation and Order
will be without prejudice to any party in this or any other proceeding, except as otherwise expressly
noted herein.
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-3 Filed 06/29/26 Page 10 of 22
11
Dated: June 29, 2026
Respectfully submitted,
FOR PLAINTIFF
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
/s/ Jeffrey Vernon
JEFFREY VERNON
United States Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
450 Fifth St. NW, Suite 4000
Washington DC 20530
Telephone: 202-367-6424
Email: jeffrey.vernon@usdoj.gov
FOR DEFENDANT
HICKMAN’S EGG RANCH, INC:
/s/ Mike Bonanno
MIKE BONANNO
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Telephone: (202) 538-8225
555 13th Street NW
Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20004
Email: mikebonanno@quinnemmanuel.com
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF NEW
YORK:
LETITIA JAMES
Attorney General
CHRISTOPHER D’ANGELO
Chief Deputy Attorney General,
Economic Justice Division
ELINOR R. HOFFMANN
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Chief, Antitrust Bureau
Elinor.Hoffmann@ag.ny.gov
AMY MCFARLANE
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Deputy Chief, Antitrust Bureau
Amy.McFarlane@ag.ny.gov
/s/ Isabella Pitt
ISABELLA PITT
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Bureau
Isabella.Pitt@ag.ny.gov
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-3 Filed 06/29/26 Page 11 of 22
12
JAMES YOON
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Bureau
James.Yoon@ag.ny.gov
New York State Office of the Attorney
General
28 Liberty Street
New York, NY 10005
(212) 416-8436
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of New York
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF ARIZONA:
KRISTIN K. MAYES
Attorney General
/s/ Sarah M. Pelton
SARAH M. PELTON (pro hac vice
forthcoming)
Office of the Arizona Attorney General
Consumer Protection & Advocacy Section
2005 N. Central Avenue
Phoenix, AZ 85004
Telephone: (602) 542-3725
Sarah.Pelton@azag.gov
Attorney for Plaintiff State of Arizona
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF
CALIFORNIA:
ROB BONTA
Attorney General
/s/ Michael Jorgenson
MICHAEL JORGENSON (Pro Hac Vice
Forthcoming)
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
PAUL CHANDER (Pro Hac Vice
Forthcoming)
MATTHEW DELGADO (Pro Hac Vice
Forthcoming)
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-3 Filed 06/29/26 Page 12 of 22
13
Deputy Attorneys General
PAULA BLIZZARD (Pro Hac Vice
Forthcoming)
Senior Assistant Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
California Department of Justice
300 S. Spring St.
Los Angeles, California 90013
Telephone: (213) 269-6000
paul.chander@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of California
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF
COLORADO:
PHILIP J. WEISER
Attorney General
/s/ Elizabeth W. Hereford
ELIZABETH W. HEREFORD
Assistant Attorney General
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
BRYN A. WILLIAMS
First Assistant Attorney General
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Colorado Department of Law
1300 Broadway, 9th Floor
Denver, CO 80203
Telephone: (720) 508-6000
Elizabeth.Hereford@coag.gov
Bryn.Williams@coag.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Colorado
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF
CONNECTICUT:
WILLIAM TONG
Attorney General
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-3 Filed 06/29/26 Page 13 of 22
14
NICOLE DEMERS
Chief, Antitrust Section
Deputy Associate Attorney General
/s/ Rose Levine
ROSE LEVINE
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
AMY TAYLOR
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorneys General
Connecticut Office of the Attorney General
165 Capitol Avenue
Hartford, CT 06106
Tel: (860) 808-5030
Fax: (860) 808-5391
Nicole.Demers@ct.gov
Rose.Levine@ct.gov
Amy.Taylor@ct.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Connecticut
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF FLORIDA:
JAMES UTHMEIER
Attorney General
JASON HILBORN
Deputy Attorney General for Civil
Enforcement
LIZABETH BRADY
Director, Antitrust Division
/s/ Colin G. Fraser
COLIN G. FRASER
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Senior Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust
Division
colin.fraser@myfloridalegal.com
STEVEN J. ORBAN
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust
Division
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-3 Filed 06/29/26 Page 14 of 22
15
steven.orban@myfloridalegal.com
Florida Office of the Attorney General
The Capitol, PL-01
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050
(850) 414-3300
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Florida
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF HAWAII:
ANNE E. LOPEZ
Attorney General
CHRISTOPHER J.I. LEONG
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
Commerce and Economic Development
Division
christopher.ji.leong@hawaii.gov
/s/ Rodney I. Kimura
RODNEY I. KIMURA
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Deputy Attorney General
rodney.i.kimura@hawaii.gov
Department of the Attorney General
425 Queen Street
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
(808) 586-1180
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Hawaii
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF IOWA:
BRENNA BIRD
Attorney General
/s/ Noah Goerlitz
NOAH GOERLITZ
Assistant Attorney General
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-3 Filed 06/29/26 Page 15 of 22
16
Office of the Iowa Attorney General
1305 E. Walnut St.
Des Moines, IA 50319
Tel: (515) 725-1018
noah.goerlitz@ag.iowa.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Iowa
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF
MARYLAND:
ANTHONY G. BROWN
Attorney General
/s/ Schonette J. Walker
SCHONETTE J. WALKER
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Chief, Antitrust Division
swalker@oag.maryland.gov
JONATHAN DE JONG
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust
Division
jdejong@oag.maryland.gov
Maryland Office of the Attorney General
200 Saint Paul Place, 19th Floor
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
(410) 576-6470
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Maryland
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF
MINNESOTA:
KEITH ELLISON
Attorney General
/s/ Jon M. Woodruff
JON M. WOODRUFF
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General
jon.woodruff@ag.state.mn.us
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-3 Filed 06/29/26 Page 16 of 22
17
Office of the Minnesota Attorney General
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 600
Saint Paul, MN 55101
(651) 300-7425
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Minnesota
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF NORTH
CAROLINA:
JEFF JACKSON
Attorney General
KUNAL J. CHOKSI
Senior Deputy Attorney General
/s/ Charles White
CHARLES G. WHITE
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General
North Carolina Department of Justice
P.O. Box 629
Raleigh, NC 27602
Tel: 919-716-6000
Facsimile: (919) 716-6050
Email: cwhite@ncdoj.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of North Carolina
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF OHIO:
D. ANDREW WILSON
Attorney General
ERIK J. CLARK
Deputy Attorney General
BETH A. FINNERTY
Section Chief, Antitrust Section
EDWARD J. OLSZEWSKI
Assistant Section Chief, Antitrust Section
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-3 Filed 06/29/26 Page 17 of 22
18
/s/ Steven A. Oldham
STEVEN A. OLDHAM
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Principal Assistant Attorney General
Steven.Oldham@OhioAGO.gov
THOMAS W. ALLEN
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General
Thomas.Allen@OhioAGO.gov
Office of the Ohio Attorney General
Antitrust Section
30 East Broad Street, 26th Floor
Columbus, OH 43215
(614) 466-4328
Attorneys for the Plaintiff State of Ohio
FOR PLAINTIFF COMMONWEALTH
OF PENNSYLVANIA:
DAVID W. SUNDAY, JR.
Attorney General
SEAN KIRKPATRICK
Executive Deputy Attorney General
Public Protection Division
TRACY W. WERTZ
Chief Deputy Attorney General
Antitrust Section
/s/ Jennifer J. Kirk
JENNIFER J. KIRK
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Senior Deputy Attorney General
Antitrust Section
jkirk@attorneygeneral.gov
(717) 497-5304
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania Office of
Attorney General
14th Floor, Strawberry Square
Harrisburg, PA 17120
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-3 Filed 06/29/26 Page 18 of 22
19
Attorneys for Plaintiff Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF TEXAS:
KEN PAXTON
Attorney General
BRENT WEBSTER
First Assistant Attorney General
RALPH MOLINA
Deputy First Assistant Attorney General
AUSTIN KINGHORN
Deputy Attorney General for Civil Litigation
THOMAS D. YORK.
Chief, Antitrust Division
/s/ Cole Pritchett
COLE PRITCHETT
Assistant Attorney General
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
cole.pritchett@oag.texas.gov
Office of the Attorney General
Antitrust Division
P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station
Austin, Texas 78711-2548
Telephone: (512) 475-4196
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Texas
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF UTAH:
DEREK BROWN
Attorney General
DOUGLAS CRAPO
Deputy Attorney General,
Public Protection Department
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-3 Filed 06/29/26 Page 19 of 22
20
/s/ Marie W.L. Martin
MARIE W.L. MARTIN
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Division Director, Antitrust & Data Privacy
Division
mwmartin@agutah.gov
Utah Office of the Attorney General
160 E, 300 S, 5th Floor
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-0830
(801) 366-0260
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Utah
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF
VERMONT:
CHARITY R. CLARK
Attorney General
/s/Alexandra Spring
Alexandra Spring
Assistant Attorney General
(Pro hac vice forthcoming)
109 State Street
Montpelier, VT 05609
Alexandra.Spring@vermont.gov
(802) 828-5529
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Vermont
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF
WISCONSIN:
JOSHUA KAUL
Attorney General
/s/ Caitlin M. Madden
CAITLIN MADDEN
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General
caitlin.madden@wisdoj.gov
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-3 Filed 06/29/26 Page 20 of 22
21
Wisconsin Department of Justice
Post Office Box 7857
Madison, WI 53707-7857
(608) 267-1311
Attorney for Plaintiff State of Wisconsin
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-3 Filed 06/29/26 Page 21 of 22
22
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED by the Court, this ______ day of ____________________, _________.
__________
United States District Judge
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-3 Filed 06/29/26 Page 22 of 22
