IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA
WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE
OF ARIZONA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF
CONNECTICUT, STATE OF FLORIDA,
STATE OF HAWAII, STATE OF IOWA,
STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF
MINNESOTA, STATE OF NEW YORK,
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF
OHIO, COMMONWEALTH OF
PENNSYLVANIA, STATE OF TEXAS,
STATE OF UTAH, STATE OF VERMONT,
and STATE OF WISCONSIN,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC., CENTRUM
VALLEY HOLDINGS, LLC, VERSOVA
HOLDINGS, LLC, VERSOVA
MANAGEMENT COOPERATIVE, AND
HICKMAN’S EGG RANCH, INC.,
Defendants.
Civil Action 5:26-cv-04060
STIPULATION AND ORDER
It is hereby stipulated by and between the undersigned parties, subject to approval and entry
by the Court, as follows.
I. DEFINITION
“Settling States” means the States of New York, Arizona, California, Colorado,
Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Iowa, Maryland, Minnesota, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania,
Texas, Utah, Vermont, and Wisconsin.
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-1 Filed 06/29/26 Page 1 of 20
2
II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over the parties to it.
Venue for this action is proper in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.
III. COMPLIANCE WITH AND ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT
A. The proposed Final Judgment filed with this Stipulation and Order, or any amended
proposed Final Judgment agreed upon in writing by the United States, Plaintiff States, and
Defendant Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (“Cal-Maine”), may be filed with and entered by the Court as
the Final Judgment, upon the motion of the United States or upon the Court’s own motion, after
compliance with the requirements of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act (“APPA”), 15
U.S.C. § 16, and without further notice to any party or any other proceeding, as long as the United
States has not withdrawn its consent. The United States may withdraw its consent at any time
before the entry of the Final Judgment by serving notice on Cal-Maine and by filing that notice
with the Court.
B. From the date of the signing of this Stipulation and Order by Cal-Maine until the
Final Judgment is entered by the Court, or until expiration of time for all appeals of any ruling
declining entry of the proposed Final Judgment, Cal-Maine will comply with all of the terms and
provisions of the proposed Final Judgment.
C. From the date on which the Court enters this Stipulation and Order, the United
States and Plaintiff States will have the full rights and enforcement powers set forth in the proposed
Final Judgment as if the proposed Final Judgment were in full force and effect as a final order of
the Court, and Section XI of the proposed Final Judgment will also apply to violations of this
Stipulation and Order.
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-1 Filed 06/29/26 Page 2 of 20
3
D. Cal-Maine agrees to arrange, at its expense, publication of the newspaper notice
required by the APPA, which will be drafted by the United States in its sole discretion. The
publication must be arranged as quickly as possible and, in any event, no later than three business
days after Cal-Maine’s receipt of (1) the text of the notice from the United States and (2) the
identity of the newspaper or newspapers within which the publication must be made. Cal-Maine
must promptly send to the United States (1) confirmation that publication of the newspaper notices
has been arranged and (2) the certification of the publication prepared by the newspaper or
newspapers within which the notice was published.
E. Any person who wishes to submit to the United States written comments regarding
the proposed Final Judgment should do so within 60 calendar days beginning with the first day of
the publication of the newspaper notice required by APPA or the publication of the proposed Final
Judgment and the Competitive Impact Statement in the Federal Register as required by APPA,
whichever is later.
F. This Stipulation and Order applies with equal force and effect to any amended
proposed Final Judgment agreed upon in writing by the United States, Plaintiff States, and Cal-
Maine and filed with the Court.
G. Cal-Maine represents that the actions it is required to perform pursuant to the
proposed Final Judgment can and will be performed and that Cal-Maine will not later raise a claim
of mistake, hardship, or difficulty of compliance as grounds for asking the Court to modify any
provision of the proposed Final Judgment or this Stipulation and Order.
H. This Stipulation and Order, including the proposed Final Judgment filed with this
Stipulation and Order or any amended proposed Final Judgment agreed upon in writing by the
United States, Plaintiff States, and Cal-Maine, constitutes the final, complete, and exclusive
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-1 Filed 06/29/26 Page 3 of 20
4
agreement and understanding between the United States, Plaintiff States, and Cal-Maine with
respect to the settlement of the claims expressly stated in the Complaint filed in this above-
captioned case, and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, whether oral or written,
concerning the settlement embodied herein.
IV. RELEASE – SETTLING STATES
Cal-Maine is hereby fully and finally discharged and released from any antitrust claims
under the laws of the Settling States arising from the facts alleged in the Complaint.
V. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS – SETTLING STATES
Nothing in this Stipulation will be construed to waive or limit any private right of action
or any damages claim brought by third parties, including local and state government agencies, or
citizens of the Settling States, whether directly or as a class action.
VI. SETTLING STATE DONATION RELIEF
A. As part of the injunctive relief as to the Settling States, Defendant will provide or
cause to be provided thirty (30) million eggs to food banks or related non-profits (the “Donee
Organizations”) located in the Settling States (the “Egg Donations”).
B. Defendant will apportion the Egg Donations among the Settling States consistent
with written instructions provided by the Settling States no later than 30 days following the filing
of the Proposed Final Judgment. States will make best efforts to begin providing written
instructions as soon as possible following the filing of the Proposed Final Judgment. Defendant
will cooperate with the Settling States in good faith to determine the Donee Organizations and the
quantities to be donated to each organization. Defendant and Settling States agree to meet and
confer in good faith to identify the states in which Defendant’s Egg Donations will be apportioned
taking into account the states to which Defendant currently serves.
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-1 Filed 06/29/26 Page 4 of 20
5
C. The Parties agree to meet and confer in good faith following the filing of the
Judgment to determine appropriate delivery quantities and schedules, taking into account Cal-
Maine’s overall business needs and the logistical considerations associated with fulfilling the
donation obligations. Cal-Maine will deliver or cause to be delivered Eggs in full trailer load
quantities to a single reception point for each delivery and will work with each Donee Organization
and regulatory authorities in good faith to ensure an efficient and compliant process. Eggs provided
in the Egg Donations must be unspoiled, non-expired, and non-damaged Large brown and/or white
Grade A eggs, with at least 20-day shelf life, and must be at least of a quality identical to that of
eggs sold by Defendant to its grocery store customers. Cal-Maine will work with the Donee
Organization to ensure the packaging is reasonably acceptable.
D. All eggs provided by Defendant to Donee Organizations shall conform to all state
and local regulatory requirements, including enclosure and certification standards, applicable in
the jurisdiction of the Donee Organization. This includes, without limitation, compliance with
California Proposition 12 (Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 3, §§ 1320–1327.3) for Donee Organizations in
California and Colorado’s cage-free egg requirements (C.R.S. §§ 35-21-201 et seq.) for Donee
Organizations in Colorado.
E. Any charitable egg distributions, including donations to food banks in the Settling
States, planned by Defendant prior to the Effective Date of the Final Judgment will not count
toward satisfying the volume of Egg Donations required by this Stipulation. Additionally, previous
donations will not count toward satisfying the volume of Egg Donations required by this
Stipulation.
F. In completing the Egg Donations, Defendant will comply with all applicable state
and federal regulations concerning food and egg safety, sanitation, transportation, packaging,
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-1 Filed 06/29/26 Page 5 of 20
6
refrigeration, sales, and donations, including but not limited to the Egg Safety Final Rule, 21 CFR
Part 118.
G. A Settling State or Donee Organization may, in its sole discretion, refuse a delivery
if it reasonably determines that the delivery does not comply with Section VI.C or Section VI.D
of this Stipulation. In the event a Settling State or Donee Organization refuses delivery because it
does not comply with Section VI.C or Section VI.D, Defendant will be responsible for all costs
associated with regaining possession of and disposing of the eggs at issue, and will be obligated to
make a replacement delivery to the Donee Organization in compliance with the terms of this
Section.
H. Defendant will complete the Egg Donations at Defendant’s expense. Defendant
will not charge the Settling States or the Donee Organizations any price or fee, including any
shipping, freight, handling, delivery, or service fees for the packaging, storage, shipment, or for
any other task or cost associated with the Egg Donations.
I. Defendant will complete the Egg Donations by October 16, 2026 (the “Donation
Deadline”), provided that the Donee Organizations can reasonably process the donations in that
timeframe. Defendant may make the Egg Donations incrementally, provided that Defendant
delivers the full quantity of Eggs required under this Section by the Donation Deadline.
J. Defendant is obligated to coordinate with each Donee Organization as to the
logistics of the Egg Donations, to ensure adequate storage, delivery, packaging, and capacity are
available. Defendant will make deliveries to the Donee Organizations on dates and times that are
acceptable and reasonably convenient for the Donee Organizations.
K. Upon 21 days’ written notice to Defendant, any Donee Organization may redirect
its allocated Egg Donations (in whole, not in part) to another reasonably convenient nonprofit
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-1 Filed 06/29/26 Page 6 of 20
7
entity located within 100 miles of the original Donee Organization. In the event a Donee
Organization provides notice under this Section VI.K, Defendant will deliver to the new recipient
in accordance with this Section.
L. Every 30 days, beginning from the filing of the Proposed Final Judgment and until
the Egg Donations are completed, Defendant will provide the Settling States with a summary of
the progress of the Egg Donations. This summary must include, for each donation, the date of the
donation, the number of eggs included, and the identity of the recipient Donee Organization.
Additionally, to the extent practicable, the summary will also include a schedule of planned
deliveries to Donee Organizations.
M. Defendant must provide a written certification to the Settling States upon
completion of the Egg Donations. This certification must include, for each donation, the date of
the donation, the number of eggs included, and the identity of the Donee Organization.
N. In the event Defendant believes that it will be unable to complete the Egg Donations
by the Donation Deadline due to unforeseen financial or operational difficulties, acts of God or
nature, or due to the operational capacities of any of the Donee Organizations, Defendant must
provide written notice of its potential failure to comply to the Settling States before the Donation
Deadline, and as soon as it becomes reasonably practical to Defendant. Such notice shall include
information and documents sufficient to substantiate Defendant’s claimed inability to complete
the Egg Donations by the Donation Deadline. After Defendant has provided notice and has
cooperated with any requests by the Settling States for additional information or documents,
Defendant and the Settling States will negotiate in good faith as to whether to reasonably extend
the Donation Deadline by written mutual agreement such that the full Egg Donation amounts are
satisfied.
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-1 Filed 06/29/26 Page 7 of 20
8
VII. MONETARY PAYMENT TO THE SETTLING STATES
A. Defendant will pay to the Settling States a Monetary Payment in the amount of
$1,500,000 (one and a half million dollars) before the later of (i) thirty (30) days after the filing of
the Proposed Final Judgment or (ii) ten (10) days after receiving complete wire instructions and
any related verifications from New York. Such payment will be made via electronic deposit to New
York, which shall distribute the funds to the Settling States. Such Monetary Payment is provided
for the purposes of settlement only and shall be apportioned among the Settling States at the sole
discretion of the Settling States as may be agreed upon among them, and Defendant shall have no
responsibility for or influence with respect to that allocation. This payment is not a penalty.
B. The Monetary Payment may be used for any purpose the Attorneys General of the
Settling States deem, in their sole discretion, to be appropriate, consistent with, or required by, the
various states’ laws, including but not limited to:
i. antitrust or consumer protection law enforcement, including attorney fees
and expenses;
ii. for deposit into a state antitrust or consumer protection account (e.g.,
revolving account, trust account), for use in accordance with the state laws
governing that account; or,
iii. for deposit into a fund exclusively dedicated to assisting state attorneys
general to enforce the antitrust laws by defraying the costs of a) experts,
economists, and consultants in multistate antitrust investigations and
litigation, b) training or continuing education in antitrust for attorneys in
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-1 Filed 06/29/26 Page 8 of 20
9
state attorney general offices, or c) information management systems used
in multistate antitrust investigations and litigation.
VIII. DURATION OF OBLIGATIONS
In the event that (1) the United States has withdrawn its consent, as provided in Paragraph
III.A of this Stipulation and Order; (2) the United States and Plaintiff States voluntarily dismiss
the Complaint in this matter; or (3) the Court declines to enter the proposed Final Judgment, the
time has expired for all appeals of any ruling declining entry of the proposed Final Judgment, and
the Court has not otherwise ordered continued compliance with the terms and provisions of the
proposed Final Judgment, Cal-Maine is released from all further obligations under this Stipulation
and Order, and the making of this Stipulation and Order will be without prejudice to any party in
this or any other proceeding.
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-1 Filed 06/29/26 Page 9 of 20
10
Dated: June 29, 2026
Respectfully submitted,
FOR PLAINTIFF
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
/s/ Jeffrey Vernon
JEFFREY VERNON
United States Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
450 Fifth St. NW, Suite 4000
Washington DC 20530
Telephone: 202-367-6424
Email: jeffrey.vernon@usdoj.gov
FOR DEFENDANT
CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC:
/s/ Leslie A. Shubert
LESLIE A. SHUBERT (pro hac vice
forthcoming)
COREY W. ROUSH (pro hac vice
forthcoming)
MARISA S. WEST (pro hac vice
forthcoming)
Sidley Austin LLP
1501 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: 202-736-8000
Email: lshubert@sidley.com
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF NEW YORK:
LETITIA JAMES
Attorney General
CHRISTOPHER D’ANGELO
Chief Deputy Attorney General,
Economic Justice Division
ELINOR R. HOFFMANN
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Chief, Antitrust Bureau
Elinor.Hoffmann@ag.ny.gov
AMY MCFARLANE
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Deputy Chief, Antitrust Bureau
Amy.McFarlane@ag.ny.gov
/s/ Isabella Pitt
ISABELLA PITT
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-1 Filed 06/29/26 Page 10 of 20
11
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Bureau
Isabella.Pitt@ag.ny.gov
JAMES YOON
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Bureau
James.Yoon@ag.ny.gov
New York State Office of the Attorney General
28 Liberty Street
New York, NY 10005
(212) 416-8436
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of New York
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF ARIZONA:
KRISTIN K. MAYES
Attorney General
/s/ Sarah M. Pelton
SARAH M. PELTON (pro hac vice forthcoming)
Office of the Arizona Attorney General
Consumer Protection & Advocacy Section
2005 N. Central Avenue
Phoenix, AZ 85004
Telephone: (602) 542-3725
Sarah.Pelton@azag.gov
Attorney for Plaintiff State of Arizona
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF CALIFORNIA:
ROB BONTA
Attorney General
/s/ Michael Jorgenson
MICHAEL JORGENSON (Pro Hac Vice Forthcoming)
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
PAUL CHANDER (Pro Hac Vice Forthcoming)
MATTHEW DELGADO (Pro Hac Vice Forthcoming)
Deputy Attorneys General
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-1 Filed 06/29/26 Page 11 of 20
12
PAULA BLIZZARD (Pro Hac Vice Forthcoming)
Senior Assistant Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
California Department of Justice
300 S. Spring St.
Los Angeles, California 90013
Telephone: (213) 269-6000
paul.chander@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of California
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF COLORADO:
PHILIP J. WEISER
Attorney General
/s/ Elizabeth W. Hereford
ELIZABETH W. HEREFORD
Assistant Attorney General
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
BRYN A. WILLIAMS
First Assistant Attorney General
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Colorado Department of Law
1300 Broadway, 9th Floor
Denver, CO 80203
Telephone: (720) 508-6000
Elizabeth.Hereford@coag.gov
Bryn.Williams@coag.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Colorado
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF CONNECTICUT:
WILLIAM TONG
Attorney General
NICOLE DEMERS
Chief, Antitrust Section
Deputy Associate Attorney General
/s/ Rose Levine
ROSE LEVINE
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-1 Filed 06/29/26 Page 12 of 20
13
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
AMY TAYLOR
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorneys General
Connecticut Office of the Attorney General
165 Capitol Avenue
Hartford, CT 06106
Tel: (860) 808-5030
Fax: (860) 808-5391
Nicole.Demers@ct.gov
Rose.Levine@ct.gov
Amy.Taylor@ct.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Connecticut
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF FLORIDA:
JAMES UTHMEIER
Attorney General
JASON HILBORN
Deputy Attorney General for Civil Enforcement
LIZABETH BRADY
Director, Antitrust Division
/s/ Colin G. Fraser
COLIN G. FRASER
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Senior Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division
colin.fraser@myfloridalegal.com
STEVEN J. ORBAN
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division
steven.orban@myfloridalegal.com
Florida Office of the Attorney General
The Capitol, PL-01
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050
(850) 414-3300
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Florida
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-1 Filed 06/29/26 Page 13 of 20
14
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF HAWAII:
ANNE E. LOPEZ
Attorney General
CHRISTOPHER J.I. LEONG
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
Commerce and Economic Development Division
christopher.ji.leong@hawaii.gov
/s/ Rodney I. Kimura
RODNEY I. KIMURA
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Deputy Attorney General
rodney.i.kimura@hawaii.gov
Department of the Attorney General
425 Queen Street
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
(808) 586-1180
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Hawaii
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF IOWA:
BRENNA BIRD
Attorney General
/s/ Noah Goerlitz
NOAH GOERLITZ
Assistant Attorney General
Office of the Iowa Attorney General
1305 E. Walnut St.
Des Moines, IA 50319
Tel: (515) 725-1018
noah.goerlitz@ag.iowa.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Iowa
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-1 Filed 06/29/26 Page 14 of 20
15
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF MARYLAND:
ANTHONY G. BROWN
Attorney General
/s/ Schonette J. Walker
SCHONETTE J. WALKER
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Chief, Antitrust Division
swalker@oag.maryland.gov
JONATHAN DE JONG
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division
jdejong@oag.maryland.gov
Maryland Office of the Attorney General
200 Saint Paul Place, 19th Floor
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
(410) 576-6470
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Maryland
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF MINNESOTA:
KEITH ELLISON
Attorney General
/s/ Jon M. Woodruff
JON M. WOODRUFF
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General
jon.woodruff@ag.state.mn.us
Office of the Minnesota Attorney General
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 600
Saint Paul, MN 55101
(651) 300-7425
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Minnesota
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-1 Filed 06/29/26 Page 15 of 20
16
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA:
JEFF JACKSON
Attorney General
KUNAL J. CHOKSI
Senior Deputy Attorney General
/s/ Charles White
CHARLES G. WHITE
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General
North Carolina Department of Justice
P.O. Box 629
Raleigh, NC 27602
Tel: 919-716-6000
Facsimile: (919) 716-6050
Email: cwhite@ncdoj.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of North Carolina
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF OHIO:
D. ANDREW WILSON
Attorney General
ERIK J. CLARK
Deputy Attorney General
BETH A. FINNERTY
Section Chief, Antitrust Section
EDWARD J. OLSZEWSKI
Assistant Section Chief, Antitrust Section
/s/ Steven A. Oldham
STEVEN A. OLDHAM
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Principal Assistant Attorney General
Steven.Oldham@OhioAGO.gov
THOMAS W. ALLEN
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-1 Filed 06/29/26 Page 16 of 20
17
Thomas.Allen@OhioAGO.gov
Office of the Ohio Attorney General
Antitrust Section
30 East Broad Street, 26th Floor
Columbus, OH 43215
(614) 466-4328
Attorneys for the Plaintiff State of Ohio
FOR PLAINTIFF COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA:
DAVID W. SUNDAY, JR.
Attorney General
SEAN KIRKPATRICK
Executive Deputy Attorney General
Public Protection Division
TRACY W. WERTZ
Chief Deputy Attorney General
Antitrust Section
/s/ Jennifer J. Kirk
JENNIFER J. KIRK
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Senior Deputy Attorney General
Antitrust Section
jkirk@attorneygeneral.gov
(717) 497-5304
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General
14th Floor, Strawberry Square
Harrisburg, PA 17120
Attorneys for Plaintiff Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF TEXAS:
KEN PAXTON
Attorney General
BRENT WEBSTER
First Assistant Attorney General
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-1 Filed 06/29/26 Page 17 of 20
18
RALPH MOLINA
Deputy First Assistant Attorney General
AUSTIN KINGHORN
Deputy Attorney General for Civil Litigation
THOMAS D. YORK.
Chief, Antitrust Division
/s/ Cole Pritchett
COLE PRITCHETT
Assistant Attorney General
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
cole.pritchett@oag.texas.gov
Office of the Attorney General
Antitrust Division
P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station
Austin, Texas 78711-2548
Telephone: (512) 475-4196
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Texas
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF UTAH:
DEREK BROWN
Attorney General
DOUGLAS CRAPO
Deputy Attorney General,
Public Protection Department
/s/ Marie W.L. Martin
MARIE W.L. MARTIN
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Division Director, Antitrust & Data Privacy Division
mwmartin@agutah.gov
Utah Office of the Attorney General
160 E, 300 S, 5th Floor
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-0830
(801) 366-0260
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Utah
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-1 Filed 06/29/26 Page 18 of 20
19
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF VERMONT:
CHARITY R. CLARK
Attorney General
/s/Alexandra Spring
Alexandra Spring
Assistant Attorney General
(Pro hac vice forthcoming)
109 State Street
Montpelier, VT 05609
Alexandra.Spring@vermont.gov
(802) 828-5529
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Vermont
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF WISCONSIN:
JOSHUA KAUL
Attorney General
/s/ Caitlin M. Madden
CAITLIN MADDEN
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General
caitlin.madden@wisdoj.gov
Wisconsin Department of Justice
Post Office Box 7857
Madison, WI 53707-7857
(608) 267-1311
Attorney for Plaintiff State of Wisconsin
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-1 Filed 06/29/26 Page 19 of 20
20
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED by the Court, this ______ day of ____________________, _________.
__________
United States District Judge
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-1 Filed 06/29/26 Page 20 of 20
