IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA
WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE
OF ARIZONA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF
CONNECTICUT, STATE OF FLORIDA,
STATE OF HAWAII, STATE OF IOWA,
STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF
MINNESOTA, STATE OF NEW YORK,
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF
OHIO, COMMONWEALTH OF
PENNSYLVANIA, STATE OF TEXAS,
STATE OF UTAH, STATE OF VERMONT,
and STATE OF WISCONSIN,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC., CENTRUM
VALLEY HOLDINGS, LLC, VERSOVA
HOLDINGS, LLC, VERSOVA
MANAGEMENT COOPERATIVE, AND
HICKMAN’S EGG RANCH, INC.,
Defendants.
Civil Action No. 5:26-cv-04060
STIPULATION AND ORDER
It is hereby stipulated by and between the undersigned parties, subject to approval and entry
by the Court, as follows.
I. DEFINITION
“Settling States” means the States of New York, Arizona, California, Colorado,
Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Iowa, Maryland, Minnesota, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania,
Texas, Utah, Vermont, and Wisconsin.
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-5 Filed 06/29/26 Page 1 of 20
2
II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over the parties to it.
Venue for this action is proper in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.
III. COMPLIANCE WITH AND ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT
A. The proposed Final Judgment filed with this Stipulation and Order, or any amended
proposed Final Judgment agreed upon in writing by the United States, Plaintiff States, and
Defendants Centrum Valley Holdings, LLC, Versova Holdings, LLC, and Versova Management
Cooperative (collectively, “Versova Defendants”), may be filed with and entered by the Court as
the Final Judgment, upon the motion of the United States or upon the Court’s own motion, after
compliance with the requirements of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act (“APPA”), 15
U.S.C. § 16, and without further notice to any party or any other proceeding, as long as the United
States has not withdrawn its consent. The United States may withdraw its consent at any time
before the entry of the Final Judgment by serving notice on Versova Defendants and by filing that
notice with the Court.
B. From the date of the signing of this Stipulation and Order by Versova Defendants
until the Final Judgment is entered by the Court, or until expiration of time for all appeals of any
ruling declining entry of the proposed Final Judgment, Versova Defendants will comply with all
of the terms and provisions of the proposed Final Judgment.
C. From the date on which the Court enters this Stipulation and Order, the United
States and Plaintiff States will have the full rights and enforcement powers set forth in the proposed
Final Judgment as if the proposed Final Judgment were in full force and effect as a final order of
the Court, and Section XI of the proposed Final Judgment will also apply to violations of this
Stipulation and Order.
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-5 Filed 06/29/26 Page 2 of 20
3
D. Versova Defendants agree to arrange, at their expense, publication of the newspaper
notice required by the APPA, which will be drafted by the United States in its sole discretion. The
publication must be arranged as quickly as possible and, in any event, no later than three business
days after Versova Defendants’ receipt of (1) the text of the notice from the United States and (2)
the identity of the newspaper or newspapers within which the publication must be made. Versova
Defendants must promptly send to the United States (1) confirmation that publication of the
newspaper notices has been arranged and (2) the certification of the publication prepared by the
newspaper or newspapers within which the notice was published.
E. Any person who wishes to submit to the United States written comments regarding
the proposed Final Judgment should do so within 60 calendar days beginning with the first day of
the publication of the newspaper notice required by APPA or the publication of the proposed Final
Judgment and the Competitive Impact Statement in the Federal Register as required by APPA,
whichever is later.
F. This Stipulation and Order applies with equal force and effect to any amended
proposed Final Judgment agreed upon in writing by the United States, Plaintiff States, and Versova
Defendants and filed with the Court.
G. Versova Defendants represent that the actions they are required to perform pursuant
to the proposed Final Judgment can and will be performed and that Versova Defendants will not
later raise a claim of mistake, hardship, or difficulty of compliance as grounds for asking the Court
to modify any provision of the proposed Final Judgment or this Stipulation and Order.
H. This Stipulation and Order, including the proposed Final Judgment filed with this
Stipulation and Order or any amended proposed Final Judgment agreed upon in writing by the
United States, Plaintiff States, and Versova Defendants, constitutes the final, complete, and
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-5 Filed 06/29/26 Page 3 of 20
4
exclusive agreement and understanding between the United States, Plaintiff States, and Versova
Defendants with respect to the settlement of the claims expressly stated in the Complaint filed in
this above-captioned case, and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, whether oral
or written, concerning the settlement embodied herein.
IV. RELEASE – SETTLING STATES
Versova Defendants are hereby fully and finally discharged and released from any civil
claims under the laws of the Settling States arising from the allegations of unlawful conduct in the
Complaint. Versova Defendants will comply with Sections VI and VII of the Stipulation regardless
of whether the Final Judgment is entered by the Court. The Settling States also agree that the
release of state claims in this Section IV of the Stipulation shall apply regardless of whether the
Final Judgment is entered by the Court.1
V. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS – SETTLING STATES
Nothing in this Stipulation will be construed to waive or limit any private right of action
or any damages claim brought by third parties, including local and state government
agencies, or citizens of the Settling States, whether directly or as a class action.
VI. SETTLING STATES DONATION RELIEF
A. As part of the injunctive relief as to the Settling States, Versova Defendants will
provide or cause to be provided twenty (20) million eggs to food banks or related non-profits (the
“Donee Organizations”) located in the Settling States (the “Egg Donations”).
B. Versova Defendants will apportion the Egg Donations among the Settling States
consistent with written instructions provided by the Settling States within 60 days following the
1 The release and reservation of rights by the Settling States in Sections IV and V of this Stipulation apply
to “Versova” as defined in Section II.A of the proposed Final Judgment.
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-5 Filed 06/29/26 Page 4 of 20
5
filing of the Proposed Final Judgment. Versova Defendants will cooperate with the Settling States
in good faith to determine the Donee Organizations and the quantities to be donated to each
organization provided that the minimum amount of eggs in each delivery will be one (1) pallet of
eggs. Versova Defendants and Settling States agree to meet and confer in good faith to identify
the states in which Versova Defendants’ Egg Donations will be apportioned taking into account
the states to which Versova Defendants currently serve.
C. Eggs provided in the Egg Donations must be unspoiled, non-expired, and non-
damaged Medium and/or Large brown and/or white Grade A eggs, with at least 20-day shelf life,
and must be at least of a quality identical to that of eggs sold by Versova Defendants to their
grocery store customers. Eggs must be packaged in a 12-carton package or any other reasonable
manner deemed acceptable by the Donee Organization.
D. All eggs provided by Versova Defendants to Donee Organizations shall conform to
all state and local regulatory requirements, including enclosure and certification standards,
applicable in the jurisdiction of the Donee Organization. This includes, without limitation,
compliance with California Proposition 12 (Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 3, §§ 1320–1327.3) for Donee
Organizations in California and Colorado’s cage-free egg requirements (C.R.S. §§ 35-21-201 et
seq.) for Donee Organizations in Colorado.
E. Any charitable egg distributions, including donations to food banks in the Settling
States, planned by Versova Defendants prior to the date this Stipulation is filed will not count
toward satisfying the volume of Egg Donations required by this Stipulation. Additionally, Previous
Donations will not count toward satisfying the volume of Egg Donations required by this
Stipulation. For purposes of this Section, “Previous Donations” means the annual average quantity
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-5 Filed 06/29/26 Page 5 of 20
6
of Eggs donated by Versova Defendants to food banks and other charitable organizations, or
nonprofits in the Settling States between 2022 and 2025.
F. In completing the Egg Donations, Versova Defendants will comply with all
applicable state and federal regulations concerning food and egg safety, sanitation, transportation,
packaging, refrigeration, sales, and donations, including but not limited to the Egg Safety Final
Rule, 21 CFR Part 118.
G. If a Settling State or Donee Organization reasonably determines that the delivery
does not comply with Section VI.C or Section VI.D of this Stipulation, a Settling State or Donee
Organization will provide Versova Defendants with notice within 7 days, an explanation of the
alleged non-compliance, and an opportunity to demonstrate compliance. In the event that it is
thereafter confirmed by a Settling State that Versova Defendants are unable to cure, and the
delivery does not comply with Section VI.C or Section VI.D, and a Settling State or Donee
Organization has refused delivery, Versova Defendants will be responsible for all costs associated
with regaining possession of and disposing of the eggs at issue, and will be obligated to make a
replacement delivery to the Donee Organization in compliance with the terms of this Section.
H. Versova Defendants will complete the Egg Donations at Versova Defendants’
expense. Versova Defendants will not charge the Settling States or the Donee Organizations any
price or fee, including any shipping, freight, handling, delivery, or service fees for the packaging,
storage, shipment, or for any other task or cost associated with the Egg Donations.
I. Versova Defendants will complete the Egg Donations within thirty-six (36) months
following the filing of the Final Judgment (the “Donation Deadline”).
J. Versova Defendants are obligated to coordinate with each Donee Organization as
to the logistics of the Egg Donations, to ensure adequate storage, delivery, packaging, and capacity
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-5 Filed 06/29/26 Page 6 of 20
7
are available. Versova Defendants will make deliveries to the Donee Organizations on dates and
times that are acceptable and reasonably convenient for the Donee Organizations.
K. Upon 21 days’ written notice to Versova Defendants, any Donee Organization may
redirect its allocated Egg Donations (in whole, not in part) to another reasonably convenient
nonprofit entity located within 100 miles of the Donee Organization. In the event a Donee
Organization provides notice under this Section VI.K, Versova Defendants will deliver to the new
recipient in accordance with this Section.
L. On a quarterly basis beginning with Versova Defendants’ second full financial
quarter following the filing of the Proposed Final Judgment and until the Egg Donations are
completed, Versova Defendants will provide the Settling States with a summary of the progress of
the Egg Donations. This summary must include, for each donation, the date of the donation, the
number of eggs included, and the identity of the recipient Donee Organization. Additionally, to
the extent practicable, Versova Defendants must provide reasonable advance notice of a planned
delivery to a Donee Organization to the Settling State in which the Donee Organization is located.
M. Versova Defendants must provide a written certification to the Settling States upon
completion of the Egg Donations. This certification must include, for each donation, the date of
the donation, the number of eggs included, and the identity of the Donee Organization. Upon
receipt of such certification, the Settling States shall review and, within a reasonable period of
time, respond in writing to Versova Defendants confirming that Versova Defendants’ Egg
Donations have, to the extent known by the Settling States, met their Egg Donation obligations
under this Stipulation.
N. In the event Versova Defendants believe that they will be unable to complete the
Egg Donations by the Donation Deadline, Versova Defendants must provide written notice of the
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-5 Filed 06/29/26 Page 7 of 20
8
potential failure to meet the Donation Deadline to the Settling States prior to the Donation
Deadline. This notice must include information and documents sufficient to substantiate Versova
Defendants’ inability to complete the Egg Donations by the Donation Deadline. After Versova
Defendants have provided notice and have cooperated with any requests by the Settling States for
additional information, the Parties will negotiate in good faith as to whether to reasonably extend
the Donation Deadline by written mutual agreement such that the full Egg Donation amounts are
satisfied.
VII. MONETARY PAYMENT TO THE SETTLING STATES
A. Versova Defendants will pay to the Settling States a Monetary Payment in the
amount of $800,000 (eight hundred thousand dollars) before the later of (i) thirty (30) days after
the filing of the Proposed Final Judgment or (ii) ten (10) days after receiving complete wire
instructions and any related verifications from New York. Such payment will be made via
electronic deposit to New York, which shall distribute the funds to the Settling States. Such
Monetary Payment is provided for the purposes of settlement only and shall be apportioned among
the Settling States at the sole discretion of the Settling States as may be agreed upon among them,
and Versova Defendants shall have no responsibility for or influence with respect to that allocation.
This payment does not constitute a fine, penalty, forfeiture, or payment in lieu thereof.
B. The Monetary Payment may be used for any purpose the Attorneys General of the
Settling States deem, in their sole discretion, to be appropriate, consistent with, or required by, the
various states’ laws, including but not limited to:
i. antitrust or consumer protection law enforcement, including attorney fees
and expenses;
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-5 Filed 06/29/26 Page 8 of 20
9
ii. for deposit into a state antitrust or consumer protection account (e.g.,
revolving account, trust account), for use in accordance with the state laws
governing that account;
iii. for deposit into a fund exclusively dedicated to assisting state attorneys
general to enforce the antitrust laws by defraying the costs of a) experts,
economists, and consultants in multistate antitrust investigations and
litigation, b) training or continuing education in antitrust for attorneys in
state attorney general offices, or c) information management systems used
in multistate antitrust investigations and litigation; or
iv. for any other purpose as the attorney general deems appropriate, consistent
with the state law.
VIII. DURATION OF OBLIGATIONS
In the event that (1) the United States has withdrawn its consent, as provided in Paragraph
III.A of this Stipulation and Order; (2) the United States and Plaintiff States voluntarily dismiss
the Complaint in this matter; or (3) the Court declines to enter the proposed Final Judgment, the
time has expired for all appeals of any ruling declining entry of the proposed Final Judgment, and
the Court has not otherwise ordered continued compliance with the terms and provisions of the
proposed Final Judgment, Versova Defendants are released from all further obligations under this
Stipulation and Order, and the making of this Stipulation and Order will be without prejudice to
any party in this or any other proceeding.
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-5 Filed 06/29/26 Page 9 of 20
10
Dated: June 29, 2026
Respectfully submitted,
FOR PLAINTIFF
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
/s/ Jeffrey Vernon
JEFFREY VERNON
United States Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
450 Fifth St. NW, Suite 4000
Washington DC 20530
Telephone: 202-367-6424
Email: jeffrey.vernon@usdoj.gov
FOR DEFENDANTS
CENTRUM VALLEY HOLDINGS, LLC,
VERSOVA HOLDINGS, LLC, AND
VERSOVA MANAGEMENT
COOPERATIVE:
Megan C. Rahman
MEGAN C. RAHMAN
CHRISTOPHER W. CARLSON, JR.
Troutman Pepper Locke LLP
1001 Haxall Point
15th Floor
Richmond, VA 23219
Telephone: 804-697-1374
Email: megan.rahman@troutman.com
Email: chris.carlson@troutman.com
FOR DEFENDANTS
CENTRUM VALLEY HOLDINGS, LLC,
VERSOVA HOLDINGS, LLC, AND
VERSOVA MANAGEMENT
COOPERATIVE:
Michael J. Hartman
MICHAEL J. HARTMAN
Troutman Pepper Locke LLP
3000 Two Logan Square
Eighteenth and Arch Streets
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Telephone: 215-981-4081
Email: michael.hartman@troutman.com
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF NEW YORK:
LETITIA JAMES
Attorney General
CHRISTOPHER D’ANGELO
Chief Deputy Attorney General,
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-5 Filed 06/29/26 Page 10 of 20
11
Economic Justice Division
ELINOR R. HOFFMANN
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Chief, Antitrust Bureau
Elinor.Hoffmann@ag.ny.gov
AMY MCFARLANE
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Deputy Chief, Antitrust Bureau
Amy.McFarlane@ag.ny.gov
/s/ Isabella Pitt
ISABELLA PITT
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Bureau
Isabella.Pitt@ag.ny.gov
JAMES YOON
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Bureau
James.Yoon@ag.ny.gov
New York State Office of the Attorney General
28 Liberty Street
New York, NY 10005
(212) 416-8436
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of New York
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF ARIZONA:
KRISTIN K. MAYES
Attorney General
/s/ Sarah M. Pelton
SARAH M. PELTON (pro hac vice forthcoming)
Office of the Arizona Attorney General
Consumer Protection & Advocacy Section
2005 N. Central Avenue
Phoenix, AZ 85004
Telephone: (602) 542-3725
Sarah.Pelton@azag.gov
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-5 Filed 06/29/26 Page 11 of 20
12
Attorney for Plaintiff State of Arizona
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF CALIFORNIA:
ROB BONTA
Attorney General
/s/ Michael Jorgenson
MICHAEL JORGENSON (Pro Hac Vice Forthcoming)
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
PAUL CHANDER (Pro Hac Vice Forthcoming)
MATTHEW DELGADO (Pro Hac Vice Forthcoming)
Deputy Attorneys General
PAULA BLIZZARD (Pro Hac Vice Forthcoming)
Senior Assistant Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
California Department of Justice
300 S. Spring St.
Los Angeles, California 90013
Telephone: (213) 269-6000
paul.chander@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of California
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF COLORADO:
PHILIP J. WEISER
Attorney General
/s/ Elizabeth W. Hereford
ELIZABETH W. HEREFORD
Assistant Attorney General
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
BRYN A. WILLIAMS
First Assistant Attorney General
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Colorado Department of Law
1300 Broadway, 9th Floor
Denver, CO 80203
Telephone: (720) 508-6000
Elizabeth.Hereford@coag.gov
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-5 Filed 06/29/26 Page 12 of 20
13
Bryn.Williams@coag.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Colorado
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF CONNECTICUT:
WILLIAM TONG
Attorney General
NICOLE DEMERS
Chief, Antitrust Section
Deputy Associate Attorney General
/s/ Rose Levine
ROSE LEVINE
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
AMY TAYLOR
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorneys General
Connecticut Office of the Attorney General
165 Capitol Avenue
Hartford, CT 06106
Tel: (860) 808-5030
Fax: (860) 808-5391
Nicole.Demers@ct.gov
Rose.Levine@ct.gov
Amy.Taylor@ct.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Connecticut
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF FLORIDA:
JAMES UTHMEIER
Attorney General
JASON HILBORN
Deputy Attorney General for Civil Enforcement
LIZABETH BRADY
Director, Antitrust Division
/s/ Colin G. Fraser
COLIN G. FRASER
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-5 Filed 06/29/26 Page 13 of 20
14
Senior Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division
colin.fraser@myfloridalegal.com
STEVEN J. ORBAN
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division
steven.orban@myfloridalegal.com
Florida Office of the Attorney General
The Capitol, PL-01
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050
(850) 414-3300
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Florida
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF HAWAII:
ANNE E. LOPEZ
Attorney General
CHRISTOPHER J.I. LEONG
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
Commerce and Economic Development Division
christopher.ji.leong@hawaii.gov
/s/ Rodney I. Kimura
RODNEY I. KIMURA
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Deputy Attorney General
rodney.i.kimura@hawaii.gov
Department of the Attorney General
425 Queen Street
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
(808) 586-1180
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Hawaii
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF IOWA:
BRENNA BIRD
Attorney General
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-5 Filed 06/29/26 Page 14 of 20
15
/s/ Noah Goerlitz
NOAH GOERLITZ
Assistant Attorney General
Office of the Iowa Attorney General
1305 E. Walnut St.
Des Moines, IA 50319
Tel: (515) 725-1018
noah.goerlitz@ag.iowa.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Iowa
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF MARYLAND:
ANTHONY G. BROWN
Attorney General
/s/ Schonette J. Walker
SCHONETTE J. WALKER
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Chief, Antitrust Division
swalker@oag.maryland.gov
JONATHAN DE JONG
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division
jdejong@oag.maryland.gov
Maryland Office of the Attorney General
200 Saint Paul Place, 19th Floor
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
(410) 576-6470
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Maryland
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF MINNESOTA:
KEITH ELLISON
Attorney General
/s/ Jon M. Woodruff
JON M. WOODRUFF
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General
jon.woodruff@ag.state.mn.us
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-5 Filed 06/29/26 Page 15 of 20
16
Office of the Minnesota Attorney General
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 600
Saint Paul, MN 55101
(651) 300-7425
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Minnesota
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA:
JEFF JACKSON
Attorney General
KUNAL J. CHOKSI
Senior Deputy Attorney General
/s/ Charles White
CHARLES G. WHITE
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General
North Carolina Department of Justice
P.O. Box 629
Raleigh, NC 27602
Tel: 919-716-6000
Facsimile: (919) 716-6050
Email: cwhite@ncdoj.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of North Carolina
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF OHIO:
D. ANDREW WILSON
Attorney General
ERIK J. CLARK
Deputy Attorney General
BETH A. FINNERTY
Section Chief, Antitrust Section
EDWARD J. OLSZEWSKI
Assistant Section Chief, Antitrust Section
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-5 Filed 06/29/26 Page 16 of 20
17
/s/ Steven A. Oldham
STEVEN A. OLDHAM
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Principal Assistant Attorney General
Steven.Oldham@OhioAGO.gov
THOMAS W. ALLEN
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General
Thomas.Allen@OhioAGO.gov
Office of the Ohio Attorney General
Antitrust Section
30 East Broad Street, 26th Floor
Columbus, OH 43215
(614) 466-4328
Attorneys for the Plaintiff State of Ohio
FOR PLAINTIFF COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA:
DAVID W. SUNDAY, JR.
Attorney General
SEAN KIRKPATRICK
Executive Deputy Attorney General
Public Protection Division
TRACY W. WERTZ
Chief Deputy Attorney General
Antitrust Section
/s/ Jennifer J. Kirk
JENNIFER J. KIRK
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Senior Deputy Attorney General
Antitrust Section
jkirk@attorneygeneral.gov
(717) 497-5304
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General
14th Floor, Strawberry Square
Harrisburg, PA 17120
Attorneys for Plaintiff Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-5 Filed 06/29/26 Page 17 of 20
18
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF TEXAS:
KEN PAXTON
Attorney General
BRENT WEBSTER
First Assistant Attorney General
RALPH MOLINA
Deputy First Assistant Attorney General
AUSTIN KINGHORN
Deputy Attorney General for Civil Litigation
THOMAS D. YORK.
Chief, Antitrust Division
/s/ Cole Pritchett
COLE PRITCHETT
Assistant Attorney General
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
cole.pritchett@oag.texas.gov
Office of the Attorney General
Antitrust Division
P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station
Austin, Texas 78711-2548
Telephone: (512) 475-4196
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Texas
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF UTAH:
DEREK BROWN
Attorney General
DOUGLAS CRAPO
Deputy Attorney General,
Public Protection Department
/s/ Marie W.L. Martin
MARIE W.L. MARTIN
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-5 Filed 06/29/26 Page 18 of 20
19
Division Director, Antitrust & Data Privacy Division
mwmartin@agutah.gov
Utah Office of the Attorney General
160 E, 300 S, 5th Floor
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-0830
(801) 366-0260
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Utah
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF VERMONT:
CHARITY R. CLARK
Attorney General
/s/Alexandra Spring
Alexandra Spring
Assistant Attorney General
(Pro hac vice forthcoming)
109 State Street
Montpelier, VT 05609
Alexandra.Spring@vermont.gov
(802) 828-5529
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Vermont
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF WISCONSIN:
JOSHUA KAUL
Attorney General
/s/ Caitlin M. Madden
CAITLIN MADDEN
(pro hac vice forthcoming)
Assistant Attorney General
caitlin.madden@wisdoj.gov
Wisconsin Department of Justice
Post Office Box 7857
Madison, WI 53707-7857
(608) 267-1311
Attorney for Plaintiff State of Wisconsin
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-5 Filed 06/29/26 Page 19 of 20
20
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED by the Court, this ______ day of ____________________, _________.
__________
United States District Judge
Case 5:26-cv-04060 Document 2-5 Filed 06/29/26 Page 20 of 20
