A performance audit of sensitive materials in schools revealed that local education agencies (LEAs) face challenges regarding digital filtering and classroom library management. The report from the Office of the Legislative Auditor General indicated that while most LEAs are adhering to recent statutes, inconsistencies in communication and filtering remain concerns.
The audit found that statewide filtering systems allow some concerning keyword searches despite blocking inappropriate results. While LEAs use filtering software, many do not use keyword filtering on state-provided resources like the Utah Online School Library. In several tested LEAs, searches for blocked keywords on the platform returned results, creating a risk that students could access inappropriate content.
Regarding library materials, the audit noted that LEAs generally lack proactive standards for selecting appropriate library materials. Current policies often focus on the reactive removal of materials rather than proactive selection. Additionally, the report found that LEAs do not adequately communicate with teachers regarding sensitive materials processes, leaving some educators without clear guidance for classroom libraries.
The audit also addressed the impact of legislative changes. While the 2024 clarification to the sensitive materials code allowed LEAs to comply more easily, the rapid statutory changes between 2022 and 2024 have caused some confusion among school-level staff. Some teachers reported varied understanding of the laws and expressed concerns about making mistakes regarding classroom collections.
The Office of the Legislative Auditor General provided several recommendations to the Legislature. These include considering requirements for LEAs to use blocked keyword lists in educational databases and requiring policies for library book selection processes. The report also recommended that LEAs implement policies to ensure consistent communication with all school staff regarding sensitive materials processes.
