THE WIRE · UPDATED 4:36 PM MDT No story is too small.
Official Source

S. Rept. 119-49 - YOUTH POISONING PROTECTION ACT

Official source This story comes from an official government or institutional source.
S. Rept. 119-49 - YOUTH POISONING PROTECTION ACT
Photo via Source Author
119th Congress (2025-2026) Committee ReportHide Overview Report Type:Senate Report Accompanies:S.289 Committees: Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee Report text available as: TXT PDF (540KB)   (PDF provides a complete and accurate display of this text.) Tip ?

S. Rept. 119-49 - YOUTH POISONING PROTECTION ACT119th Congress (2025-2026)

Committee ReportHide Overview

Report Type:Senate Report

Accompanies:S.289

Committees:

Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee

Report text available as:

TXT

PDF (540KB)

(PDF provides a complete and accurate display of this text.)

Tip

?

Calendar No. 132

119th Congress } { Report

SENATE

1st Session } { 119-49

_______________________________________________________________________

YOUTH POISONING PROTECTION ACT

__________

R E P O R T

of the

COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION

on

S. 289

July 29, 2025.--Ordered to be printed

______

U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

59-010 WASHINGTON : 2025

SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION

one hundred nineteenth congress

first session

TED CRUZ, Texas, Chairman

JOHN THUNE, South Dakota MARIA CANTWELL, Washington

ROGER F. WICKER, Mississippi AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota

DEB FISCHER, Nebraska BRIAN SCHATZ, Hawaii

JERRY MORAN, Kansas EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts

DAN SULLIVAN, Alaska GARY C. PETERS, Michigan

MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin

TODD YOUNG, Indiana TAMMY DUCKWORTH, Illinois

TED BUDD, North Carolina JACKY ROSEN, Nevada

ERIC SCHMITT, Missouri BEN RAY LUJAN, New Mexico

JOHN CURTIS, Utah JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, Colorado

BERNIE MORENO, Ohio JOHN FETTERMAN, Pennsylvania

TIM SHEEHY, Montana ANDY KIM, New Jersey

SHELLEY MOORE CAPITO, West Virginia LISA BLUNT ROCHESTER, Delaware

CYNTHIA M. LUMMIS, Wyoming

Brad Grantz, Majority Staff Director

Lila Harper Helms, Democratic Staff Director

Calendar No. 132

119th Congress } { Report

SENATE

1st Session } {119-49

======================================================================

YOUTH POISONING PROTECTION ACT

_______

July 29, 2025.--Ordered to be printed

_______

Mr. Cruz, from the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,

submitted the following

R E P O R T

[To accompany S. 289]

[Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office]

The Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, to

which was referred the bill (S. 289) to ban the sale of

products with a high concentration of sodium nitrite to

individuals, and for other purposes, having considered the

same, reports favorably thereon without amendment and

recommends that the bill do pass.

PURPOSE OF THE BILL

The purpose of S. 289 is to ban the sale of any consumer

product containing a concentration of 10 or more percent by

weight of sodium nitrite.

BACKGROUND AND NEEDS

Sodium nitrite is a widely used chemical salt used in low

concentrations to preserve and cure meat and fish.\1\ Consumers

commonly use sodium nitrite for personal meat preservation--

generally with curing salts that contain 6.25 percent sodium

nitrite concentration.\2\ Commercially, sodium nitrite is also

used as a chemical reagent used in dye and pigment

manufacturing, as a metal coating and corrosion inhibitor, and

in pharmaceuticals including as a treatment for vasodilation

and cyanide poisoning.\3\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\Susannah Frame, ```They Failed The Families': Amazon Missed

Multiple Chances to Stop Selling Chemical Used in Suicides on Its

Website,'' King 5 News, August 13, 2024 (https://www. king5.com/

article/news/investigations/investigators/amazon-missed-multiple-

opportunities-to-pull-chemical-used-in-suicides-from-its-website/281-

92592431-9d98-4917-a447-f5adae3d2815).

\2\National Center for Home Food Preservation, Cure Smoke Review

Curing Foods, University of Georgia (https://nchfp.uga.edu/

publications/nchfp-publications/literature-reviews/cure-smoke-review-

curing-foods).

\3\National Center for Biotechnology Information, PubChem Compound

Summary: Sodium Nitrite, CID 23668193, last modified April 19, 2025

(https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

compound/Sodium-Nitrite).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Although sodium nitrite has many important uses, it can be

lethal to consume--even at low concentrations.\4\ Since 2017,

the National Poison Data System has shown an increase in self-

poisonings by use of sodium nitrite.\5\ Sodium nitrite is

inexpensive and sold online, making it easily accessible.\6\

Just one teaspoon of sodium nitrite can be lethal and effects

are felt quickly due to its high water solubility, making it

more deadly than other poisons.\7\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\4\Giuseppe Davide Albano et al., ``Systemic Review of Fatal Sodium

Nitrite Ingestion Cases: Toxicological and Forensic Implications,''

Toxics, vol. 12 (2024), no. 12 (https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6304/12/11/

819).

\5\Sean D. McCann, Marit S. Tweet, and Michael S. Whal, ``Rising

Incidence and High Mortality in Intentional Sodium Nitrite Exposures

Reported to US Poison Centers,'' Clinical Toxicology, vol. 59 (March

31, 2021), no. 12, pp. 1264-1269 (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/

10.1080/15563650.2021.1905162).

\6\Jae Chol Yoon and So Eun Kim, ``Suicide Attempt Using Sodium

Nitrite Ordered on the Internet: Two Case Reports,'' Medicine, vol. 101

(July 15, 2022), no. 28 (https://journals. lww.com/md-journal/fulltext/

2022/07150/suicide_attempt_using_sodium_nitrite_ordered_on.28 .aspx);

see also supra no. 5 at p. 1266.

\7\Ibid.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A 2021 investigation by the New York Times into an online

suicide forum found not only that sodium nitrite was becoming

popular for self-poisoning, but that online suicide forums were

anonymously providing suicide kits or detailed instruction on

how to obtain and how to die using substances like sodium

nitrite.\8\ Because high concentrations were so easily

available on e-commerce sites, including Amazon, which

previously sold sodium nitrite at 99 percent purity, it was

relatively easy for youth to obtain the ingredients and follow

the suicide instructions.\9\ Due to an increased awareness

campaign on the use of sodium nitrite for suicide, several

online retailers have removed the substance for purchase from

their online marketplaces.\10\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\8\Megan Twohey and Gabriel J.X. Dance, ``Where the Despairing Log

On, and Learn Ways to Die,'' The New York Times, December 9, 2021

(https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/12/09/us/where-the-

despairing-log-on.html).

\9\Ibid.

\10\Supra no. 1; Megan Twohey and Gabriel J.X. Dance, ``Lawmakers

Press Amazon on Sales of Chemical Used in Suicides,'' The New York

Times, February 4, 2022 (https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/04/technology/

amazon-suicide-poison-preservative.html).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

This legislation would classify consumer products

containing a high concentration of sodium nitrite as a banned

hazardous product, which would prevent the product from being

sold in physical and online stores. There is no intent to

affect commercial or industrial uses. The legislation would

define a high concentration of sodium nitrite as concentration

of 10 percent or more by weight of sodium nitrite.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS

S. 289 would require consumer products with high-

concentration sodium nitrite--defined as concentration over 10

percent by weight of sodium nitrite--to be considered banned

hazardous products in the Consumer Product Safety Act.\11\

Commercial or industrial uses would not be impacted.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\11\15 U.S.C. 2057.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY

S. 289, the Youth Poisoning Protection Act, was introduced

on January 29, 2025, by Senator Duckworth (for herself and

Senators Curtis and Moreno) and was referred to the Committee

on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate. Senator

Baldwin is an additional cosponsor. On March 12, 2025, the

Committee met in open Executive Session and, by voice vote,

ordered S. 289 to be reported favorably without amendment.

118th Congress

S. 2233 was introduced on July 11, 2023, by Senator

Duckworth (for herself and Senator Vance) and was referred to

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the

Senate. On July 31, 2024, the Committee met in open Executive

Session and, by voice vote, ordered S. 2233 to be reported

favorably with an amendment (in the nature of a substitute).

Senator Collins was later added as a cosponsor.

H.R. 4310, a House companion bill, was introduced on June

22, 2023, by Representative Lori Trahan (for herself and

Representatives Carey, Porter, and Stewart) and was referred to

the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of

Representatives. Representatives Clarke, Neguse, Soto, Caraveo,

and Maloy became additional cosponsors. On December 6, 2023,

that Committee met in open Executive Session, and H.R. 4310 was

ordered to be reported by a vote of 42-0. On May 15, 2024, the

House passed H.R. 4310 under suspension of the rules by a

recorded vote of 376-33.

ESTIMATED COSTS

In accordance with paragraph 11(a) of rule XXVI of the

Standing Rules of the Senate and section 403 of the

Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the Committee provides the

following cost estimate, prepared by the Congressional Budget

Office:

Summary of legislation: On March 12, 2025, the Senate

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation ordered

reported 14 bills. This document provides estimates for 3 of

those bills. One bill, S. 414, was reported on June 24, 2025.

S. 289 would ban the sale of certain products covered by

the Consumer Product Safety Act and S. 389 would require the

Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to adopt voluntary

safety standards for lithium-ion batteries. S. 414 would

require digital advertising platforms to report annually to the

Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Estimated Federal cost: The costs of the legislation fall

within budget functions 370 (commerce and housing credit) and

550 (health).

Basis of estimate: For this estimate, CBO assumes that each

bill will be enacted near the end of fiscal year 2025 and that

the estimated amounts will be available each year. The cost

estimate does not include any effects of interactions among the

bills. If all three bills were combined and enacted as a single

piece of legislation, the effects could be different from the

sum of the separate estimates, although CBO expects that any

differences would be small.

S. 289, the Youth Poisoning Protection Act, would ban the

sale of products containing 10 percent or more by weight of

sodium nitrite that are covered under the Consumer Product

Safety Act. The legislation would not affect the sale or use of

commercial or industrial products not ordinarily intended for

consumer use or consumption.

Using information from the Consumer Product Safety

Commission, CBO estimates that implementing S. 289 would cost

$2 million over the 2025-2030 period; any related spending

would be subject to the availability of appropriated funds.

S. 389, the Setting Consumer Standards for Lithium-Ion

Batteries Act, would require the Consumer Product Safety

Commission within 180 days of enactment, to adopt certain

voluntary safety standards--specifically ANSI/CAN/UL 2271,

2849, and 2272--concerning rechargeable lithium-ion batteries

used in electric bicycles, scooters, and other micromobility

devices. The bill also would require the CPSC to determine the

applicable scope of covered consumer products and to monitor

and evaluate future revisions to the voluntary standards and

report to the Congress within five years of enactment.

Using information from the CPSC, CBO estimates that

implementing S. 389 would cost $8 million over the 2025-2030

period; any related spending would be subject to the

availability of appropriated funds.

S. 414, the ADS for Mental Health Services Act, would

require certain digital advertising platforms to report

annually to the Federal Trade Commission about advertising on

their platforms for certain mental health services, including

information on the number, percent, and dollar value of such

advertisements. Platforms that would be affected by the bill

include social media platforms, public facing websites, online

services, and mobile applications with more than 100 million

unique monthly users. The bill also would require the FTC to

report annually to the Congress summarizing that data. CBO

estimates that enacting S. 414 would cost less than $500,000

over the 2025-2030 period. Any related spending would be

subject to the availability of appropriated funds.

Pay-as-you-go considerations: The Statutory Pay-As-You-Go

Act of 2010 establishes budget-reporting and enforcement

procedures for legislation affecting direct spending or

revenues. None of the bills would affect direct spending or

revenues; thus, pay-as-you-go procedures do not apply.

Increase in long-term net direct spending and deficits: CBO

estimates that enacting S. 289, S. 389 and S. 414 would not

increase net direct spending or deficits in any of the four

consecutive 10-year periods beginning in 2036.

Mandates: All three bills would impose private-sector

mandates as defined in in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

(UMRA). None of the bills would impose intergovernmental

mandates.

S. 289, the Youth Poisoning Protection Act, would impose a

private-sector mandate as defined in UMRA by banning the sale

of consumer products containing 10 percent or more of sodium

nitrite by weight. The prohibition would not apply to

industrial uses or to food preservation. Because there is only

a small market for consumer products containing that much

sodium nitrite and some states already have curtailed the sale

of products containing sodium nitrite, CBO estimates that the

cost of the mandate would not exceed the private- sector

threshold established in UMRA ($206 million in 2025, adjusted

annually for inflation).

S. 389, the Setting Consumer Standards for Lithium-Ion

Batteries Act, would impose a private-sector mandate as defined

in UMRA by requiring manufacturers of electric mobility

devices, including bicycles and scooters, to comply with a

prospective Consumer Product Safety Commission safety standard

related to the risk of fire in lithium-ion batteries. Based on

voluntary compliance with the specified standard by domestic

manufacturers and current state and local laws requiring

compliance, CBO estimates that the cost of the mandate would

not exceed the annual private-sector threshold established in

UMRA ($206 million in 2025, adjusted annually for inflation).

S. 414, the ADS for Mental Health Services Act, would

require certain digital advertising platforms to report to the

FTC on their public service advertisements for mental and

behavioral health. That requirement would impose a private-

sector mandate as defined by UMRA. CBO estimates the cost of

the mandate would be small and not exceed the threshold

established in UMRA ($206 million in 2025, adjusted annually

for inflation) because the mandated entities generally already

possess or collect the information required to be reported

under the bill.

Estimate prepared by: Federal costs: Cyrus Ekland (for the

Consumer Product Safety Commission); Johnny Willing (for the

Federal Trade Commission). Mandates: Andrew Laughlin (for the

Consumer Product Safety Commission); Rachel Austin (for the

Federal Trade Commission).

Estimate reviewed by: Sean Dunbar, Chief, Low-Income Health

Programs and Prescription Drugs Cost Estimates Unit; Justin

Humphrey, Chief, Finance, Housing, and Education Cost Estimates

Unit; Kathleen FitzGerald, Chief, Public and Private Mandates

Unit; H. Samuel Papenfuss, Deputy Director of Budget Analysis.

Estimate approved by: Phillip L. Swagel, Director,

Congressional Budget Office.

REGULATORY IMPACT STATEMENT

In accordance with paragraph 11(b) of rule XXVI of the

Standing Rules of the Senate, the Committee provides the

following evaluation of the regulatory impact of the

legislation, as reported:

Number of Persons Covered

S. 289 would prohibit the sale of consumer products

containing a high concentration of sodium nitrite. Therefore,

the number of persons covered is (1) manufacturers of consumer

products containing a high concentration of sodium nitrite; and

(2) sellers of consumer products containing a high

concentration of sodium nitrite.

Economic Impact

S. 289 is expected to have minimal economic impact.

Commercial or industrial uses of high concentration sodium

nitrite are permitted under this Act. Additionally, large

online retailers have already removed consumer products

containing a high concentration of sodium nitrite from their

websites for purchase.

Privacy

S. 289 would not have a significant impact on the privacy

rights of individuals.

Paperwork

S. 289 would not generate any additional paperwork.

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING

In compliance with paragraph 4(b) of rule XLIV of the

Standing Rules of the Senate, the Committee provides that no

provisions contained in the bill, as reported, meet the

definition of congressionally directed spending items under the

rule.

SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS

Section 1. Short title

This section would provide that the bill may be cited as

the ``Youth Poisoning Protection Act''.

Section 2. Banning of products containing a high concentration of

sodium nitrite

Subsection (a) would provide that any consumer product with

a high concentration of sodium nitrite shall be a banned

hazardous product under section 8 of the Consumer Product

Safety Act.\12\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\12\15 U.S.C. 2057.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subsection (b) would create a rule of construction that

nothing in this section shall be construed to (1) prohibit

commercial or industrial purposes of high concentration sodium

nitrite that are not customarily produced or distributed for

sale to, or use or consumption by, or enjoyment of, a consumer;

and (2) apply to high concentration sodium nitrite that meets

the definition of the terms ``drug'', ``device'', or

``cosmetic'' (as defined in the Federal Food, Drug, and

Cosmetic Act\13\) or ``food'', including poultry, poultry

products, meat and meat food products, or egg and egg products.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\13\21 U.S.C. 321.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subsection (c) would provide definitions: (1) the term

``consumer product'' has the same meaning given under section

3(a)(5) of the Consumer Product Safety Act;\14\ (2) the term

``high concentration of sodium nitrite'' means a concentration

of 10 or more percent by weight of sodium nitrite.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\14\15 U.S.C. 2052.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subsection (d) would provide for the effective date of this

Act to be 90 days after enactment.

CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW

In compliance with paragraph 12 of rule XXVI of the

Standing Rules of the Senate, the Committee states that the

bill as reported would make no change to existing law.

Article details

CategoryOfficial Source
ToneNeutral