THE WIRE · UPDATED 4:16 PM MDT No story is too small.
Multi-SourceCoalville

State Officials Close Investigation Into 910 Ranch Elk Death

Corroborated by 2 sources Confirmed across multiple independent newsrooms. How it was made ↓
State Officials Close Investigation Into 910 Ranch Elk Death
Photo via Utah News Staff from 2 sources
State wildlife officials and the Summit County Sheriff's Office have closed an investigation into the death of a bull elk on the 910 Cattle Ranch, finding no evidence of illegal activity or poaching. The incident, which occurred in August 2025, has become a focal point in the ongoing debate over how Summit County will manage the 8,600-acre property following its $55 million acquisition.

Key takeaways

  • The Summit County Sheriff's Office and Utah DNR closed their investigation into the 2025 elk death without filing charges.
  • Investigators found no evidence of poaching, concluding the bull elk died from injuries sustained during mating season.
  • County officials requested the euthanasia of the animal because it was unable to stand and was suffering.
  • The incident has fueled a debate between those wanting a wildlife preserve and those seeking expanded public recreational access.
  • Summit County acquired the 910 Cattle Ranch for $55 million to ensure long-term conservation and habitat protection.

The Utah Department of Natural Resources and the Summit County Sheriff's Office have closed an investigation into the death of a bull elk on the 910 Cattle Ranch, concluding that the animal was euthanized legally after sustaining injuries. The decision follows months of scrutiny regarding whether county staff or officials acted unlawfully during the incident in August 2025.

Investigation finds no illegal activity

The investigation, which looked into allegations that a struggling bull elk was shot at nightfall by county staff, concluded without any charges being filed. According to the Summit County Sheriff's Office, deputies' inquiry into the circumstances of the elk's death took less than one week to complete.

The case was closed after a review by both the Sheriff's Office and the Utah Department of Natural Resources. Sheriff's spokesperson Skyler Talbot stated that both agencies decided not to pursue criminal investigations into the matter. Investigators determined there were no injuries consistent with poaching, finding instead that the elk had sustained chest trauma and a puncture wound, likely occurring during the rut, or mating season.

The controversy began following an encounter on August 31, 2025, when hikers discovered an elk stuck in a muddy spring. Christie Babalis, the unopposed nominee for Summit County Council District 4, was part of a group of four hikers who found the animal while the ranch was still being leased by the county prior to its official purchase. The group attempted to remove the elk from the mud before contacting ranch workers for assistance.

The incident led to a heated interaction between Babals and Jess Kirby, Summit County's Lands and Natural Resources Director. A recording of the exchange captured Babalis questioning why Kirby did not take action when she had also seen the elk earlier that afternoon. Kirby responded by stating she had reported the animal to her warden, who then notified the Division of Wildlife Resources.

Kirby defended the county's actions, noting that it is not the responsibility of citizens or county staff to save all wildlife. She told KPCW that during the rutting season, animals frequently become injured. Later that same night, three shots were fired on the ranch property. DNR spokesperson Faith Jolley confirmed that the agency had requested the county's open space warden to put down the elk because the animal could not stand and was likely suffering.

Warden Jeremie Forman documented in an incident report that he decided to euthanize the elk after confirming with dispatch that no on-duty DNR officer was available to respond. This decision remains a point of contention for critics like Leslie Miller, a former property owner's partner, who has publicly criticized the county's management decisions.

The elk death has become a symbol of the larger tension regarding the future of the 8,600-acre property. Summit County purchased the ranch for $55 million in January following an option agreement that began in late 2023. While the county aims to use the land for conservation and public recreation, some residents and former users of the land prefer it be maintained as a strict wildlife preserve.

Sources used (2)

  • www.summitcountyutah.govOfficialSummit County Council to Consider Purchase of the 910 Cattle Ranch
  • www.kpcw.org.org910 Ranch elk death highlights debate over wildlife, public access

How this story was made

Corroborated by 2 independent sources

Utah News confirmed this story across multiple independent newsrooms before publishing.

le.utah.govsummitcountyutah.govkpcw.org

5 sources gathered

Coverage collected from the outlets listed above. · August 14, 2026

Written by AI

Utah News AI (on-device model) · drawing on 2 outlets · July 24, 2026

Quality checks

Passed editorial quality review (75/100)

Published

31 days ago · July 24, 2026

This story was written by AI from the public sources listed above and passed automated quality review before publishing.

Article details

CategoryMulti-Source
CityCoalville
ToneNeutral
SourceAI Generated