Tags:
Consumer Protection
Bureau of Consumer Protection
Last Updated
October 26, 2026
Case Status
Pending
Federal Trade Commission; State of Alabama; State of Arizona; State of Arkansas, ex rel. Attorney General Tim Griffin; People of the State of California, acting by and through Los Angeles County Counsel Dawyn R. Harrison; State of Connecticut; Office of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Department of Legal Affairs; State of Illinois; State of Iowa, ex rel. Brenna Bird, Attorney General; State of Kansas, ex rel. Kris W. Kobach, Attorney General; State of Louisiana; People of the State of Michigan; State of Mississippi; State of Nebraska, ex rel. Michael T. Hilgers, Attorney General; State of New Jersey, by Attorney General Jennifer Davenport; State of North Carolina, ex rel. Jeff Jackson, Attorney General; State of Ohio, ex rel. Attorney General D. Andrew Wilson; State of Oklahoma; State of Tennessee, ex rel. Jonathan Skrmetti, Attorney General and Reporter; Utah Division of Consumer Protection; and State of Wisconsin, Plaintiffs, v. Dollar General Corporation, also d/b/a Dollar General, a corporation, Defendant.
FTC Matter/File Number
2623006
Federal Court
Middle District of Tennessee
Case Summary
The Federal Trade Commission, joined by 20 states, sued Dollar General Corporation for engaging in long-running deceptive pricing practices by routinely charging customers more at the register than the prices displayed on shelves, price tags and advertisements, costing consumers millions of dollars. Despite being made aware of the problem, Dollar General has failed to implement policies and practices to adequately address the problem.
